John a t robinson redating
Specifically, Robinson examined the reliability of the New Testament as he believed that it had been the subject of very little original research during the 20th century.He also wrote that past scholarship was based on a "tyranny of unexamined assumptions" and an "almost wilful blindness".Robinson was born on in the precincts of Canterbury Cathedral, England, where his father was a canon.He was educated at Marlborough College, then an all-boys independent school in Marlborough, Wiltshire.Robinson was diagnosed with terminal cancer in 1983 states: "Robinson notes that Christ, in Origen's old words, remains on the Cross so long as one sinner remains in [H]ell.This is not speculation: it is a statement grounded in the very necessity of God's nature." George Hunsinger, author of Disruptive Grace: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth writes that "[i]f one is looking for an uninhibited proponent of universal salvation, Robinson leaves nothing to be desired." In this book, an analysis of the early history of the doctrine of the parousia, Robinson states: "That the heart of the Christian hope was now, once more to 'wait for God's son from heaven', for a second and final coming which would complete and crown the first, is a belief for which we have found no firm foundation in the words of Jesus himself." Robinson further argued that there was a tendency in the early church to alter the meaning of sayings of Jesus that originally referred to his death and ascension into heaven, to refer to an event in the future that had not yet happened.
In a 2013 interview, Spong recalls reading Robinson's 1963 book: "I can remember reading his first book as if was yesterday.
On the basis that the fall of Jerusalem is never mentioned in the New Testament writings as a past fact, Dr.
Robinson defends that the books of the New Testament were written before A. 70....contradicting, of course, the consensus of generations of Bible scholars.
According to Exploration into God in (1967), he felt its chief contribution was its attempt to synthesize the work of theologians Paul Tillich and Dietrich Bonhoeffer, both of them well known in theological circles, but whose views were largely unknown to the people in the pews.
The book proved contentious because it called on Christians to view God as the "Ground of Being" rather than as a supernatural being "out there".